Table? Frameset or User control?

Hi!

I am new with ASP and now developing a web application that having two navigation menu.One is at left and another is at top side. When a user click a hyperlink at left, the top navigation menu will change according the hyperlinks at left. And when the user click the hyperlink at top, it will display the required page at bottom right hand side.

I have no idea whether the navigation menu develop as frame, table or user control. Can anyone sharing your opinion? Thanks.Hello, the menu should be a usercontrol, and you should have a look at this page to know how to setp up your pages:

Master Pages

regards

TableAdapter approach

I'm starting an application using a TableAdapter instead of direct sql
calls.
In my table adapter there's already an stored procedure that returns
columns a, b and c.
Now, I added another query, but now I need it to return columns b, c,
d, and f.
As you can see, columns does not match.

When I close the table adapter wizard for adding the query, it warns
me, or well, it informs me about this missmatch and tells me to check
it if that's the correct desire.

I thought this would throw an error, but it doesn't. I have a method
that return a different set of columns from those listed in the
TableAdapter.
Is this approach "correct" ?
If no, what's the proper way to do this ?

Thanks in advance,Any idea ?

TableAdapters and web.config

I have a class library that contains a number of TableAdapters and I'm using
this from a web application. Is there a way of getting the TableAdapters to
use the connectionstrings defined in web.config.

From the MSDN documentation it seems like it's possible to override settings
with values in a config file for winform applications. Is the same possible
for web applications.

I have tried to add a connectionstring (under the connectionstring section)
in web.config with the same name as the name in the setting file. The
connectionstring in web.config points to a database that doesn't contain the
required schema. Since I'm not getting any errors and things are still
working, I assume it is still using the default connectionstring supplied at
designtime.Hi Kimbell,

Welcome to ASP.NET newsgroup.
Regarding on the configuration issue you mentioned when using TableAdapter
from class library in asp.net 2.0 project, I've also met this problem
before. Yes, as you has mentioned, when we has build the
DataSet/TableAdapter in class library project, the TableAdapter's
Connection /ConnectionString setting is persisted in the classlibrary
assembly's content so that when referenced in asp.net 2.0 project, it won't
use the web.config file's info (but still use the one persisted at
design-time in classlibrary project). Based on my research, as for the
Project Settings, the asp.net 2.0 seems has different support from winform
project. Currently one approach is manually modify the TableAdapter's
design-time generated code in the Classlibrary project. for example:

the TAbleAdapter's autogenerate code is as below, the "InitConnection"
function is just the one which supply connectionstring and constructing the
Connection instance for the TableAdapter

=============================
private void InitConnection()
{
this.m_connection = new System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection();
this.m_connection.ConnectionString =
DSLibrary.Properties.Settings.Default.NorthwindCon nectionString;
}

which retrieve the connection string through Project's Properties.Settings
collection. We can modify it to the following one:

======================

Object obj =
System.Configuration.ConfigurationSettings.GetConf ig("connectionStrings");
ConnectionStringsSection css = obj as ConnectionStringsSection;
string connstr =
css.ConnectionStrings["LocalNorthwindConnStr"].ConnectionString;
this.m_connection = new System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection();
this.m_connection.ConnectionString = connstr;

=====================

so that it will retrieve the info from the final hosting application's
application config file (appconfig or web.config).

Hope helps. Thanks,

Steven Cheng
Microsoft Online Support

Get Secure! www.microsoft.com/security

-------
| Thread-Topic: TableAdapters and web.config
| thread-index: AcXNckyfTDC6JTskQe231gX8p+7Y9A==
| X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 195.139.24.170
| From: "=?Utf-8?B?Q2hyaXN0b3BoZXIgS2ltYmVsbA==?="
<c_kimbell@.newsgroup.nospam>
| Subject: TableAdapters and web.config
| Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 01:12:04 -0700
| Lines: 15
| Message-ID: <69C48290-408C-4942-9F61-3C909A6766E3@.microsoft.com>
| MIME-Version: 1.0
| Content-Type: text/plain;
| charset="Utf-8"
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
| X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
| Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
| Importance: normal
| Priority: normal
| X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
| NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
| Path: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
| Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl
microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet:349611
| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
|
| I have a class library that contains a number of TableAdapters and I'm
using
| this from a web application. Is there a way of getting the TableAdapters
to
| use the connectionstrings defined in web.config.
|
| From the MSDN documentation it seems like it's possible to override
settings
| with values in a config file for winform applications. Is the same
possible
| for web applications.
|
| I have tried to add a connectionstring (under the connectionstring
section)
| in web.config with the same name as the name in the setting file. The
| connectionstring in web.config points to a database that doesn't contain
the
| required schema. Since I'm not getting any errors and things are still
| working, I assume it is still using the default connectionstring supplied
at
| designtime.
|
|
So what you are recommending is to change the autogenerated code?
What about the following warning at the top of the file:

"Changes to this file may cause incorrect behavior and will be lost if the
code is regenerated."

Particularly the statement about lost changes.

I think a better approach is to change the ConnectionModifier to public in
the designer; then set the connectionstring from code.

I was hoping for a more elegant solution since Microsoft has put some work
into this settings system. Maybe in the next version.

"Steven Cheng[MSFT]" wrote:

> Hi Kimbell,
> Welcome to ASP.NET newsgroup.
> Regarding on the configuration issue you mentioned when using TableAdapter
> from class library in asp.net 2.0 project, I've also met this problem
> before. Yes, as you has mentioned, when we has build the
> DataSet/TableAdapter in class library project, the TableAdapter's
> Connection /ConnectionString setting is persisted in the classlibrary
> assembly's content so that when referenced in asp.net 2.0 project, it won't
> use the web.config file's info (but still use the one persisted at
> design-time in classlibrary project). Based on my research, as for the
> Project Settings, the asp.net 2.0 seems has different support from winform
> project. Currently one approach is manually modify the TableAdapter's
> design-time generated code in the Classlibrary project. for example:
> the TAbleAdapter's autogenerate code is as below, the "InitConnection"
> function is just the one which supply connectionstring and constructing the
> Connection instance for the TableAdapter
> =============================
> private void InitConnection()
> {
> this.m_connection = new System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection();
> this.m_connection.ConnectionString =
> DSLibrary.Properties.Settings.Default.NorthwindCon nectionString;
> }
> which retrieve the connection string through Project's Properties.Settings
> collection. We can modify it to the following one:
> ======================
> Object obj =
> System.Configuration.ConfigurationSettings.GetConf ig("connectionStrings");
> ConnectionStringsSection css = obj as ConnectionStringsSection;
> string connstr =
> css.ConnectionStrings["LocalNorthwindConnStr"].ConnectionString;
> this.m_connection = new System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection();
> this.m_connection.ConnectionString = connstr;
> =====================
> so that it will retrieve the info from the final hosting application's
> application config file (appconfig or web.config).
> Hope helps. Thanks,
> Steven Cheng
> Microsoft Online Support
Thanks for your response Kimbell,

Yes, the
========
"Changes to this file may cause incorrect behavior and will be lost if the
code is regenerated."
========
you mentioned is really a potential problem with my workaround. And your
appoarch on changing the ConnectionModifer to public is OK for
programmatical accessing. However, in most cases of ASP.NET 2.0 web
application, we will use design-time ObjectDataSource control to reference
the TableAdpater, and this is done through IDE interactively no code is
involved. So in such scenario, we may need to predefined the connection's
initilization in TableAdapter's code.

Anyway, I really appreciate your advice on the configuration setttings ,
and since this is a new feature involved in 2.0, I think it'll be improved
in the sequential versions so as to ease the component, class library
developing and seamless integrated into
front end applications.

Thanks,

Steven Cheng
Microsoft Online Support

Get Secure! www.microsoft.com/security
-------
| Thread-Topic: TableAdapters and web.config
| thread-index: AcXOO+CVs5sRlZYtRh+M2u+nQzNUBg==
| X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 195.139.24.170
| From: "=?Utf-8?B?Q2hyaXN0b3BoZXIgS2ltYmVsbA==?="
<c_kimbell@.newsgroup.nospam>
| References: <69C48290-408C-4942-9F61-3C909A6766E3@.microsoft.com>
<o4v8pDhzFHA.3712@.TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl>
| Subject: RE: TableAdapters and web.config
| Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:15:01 -0700
| Lines: 68
| Message-ID: <EAC2EB76-0E98-4837-AD33-55A57F82A6EA@.microsoft.com>
| MIME-Version: 1.0
| Content-Type: text/plain;
| charset="Utf-8"
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
| X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
| Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
| Importance: normal
| Priority: normal
| X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
| NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
| Path: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSF TNGXA03.phx.gbl
| Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl
microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet:349877
| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
|
| So what you are recommending is to change the autogenerated code?
| What about the following warning at the top of the file:
|
| "Changes to this file may cause incorrect behavior and will be lost if
the
| code is regenerated."
|
| Particularly the statement about lost changes.
|
| I think a better approach is to change the ConnectionModifier to public
in
| the designer; then set the connectionstring from code.
|
| I was hoping for a more elegant solution since Microsoft has put some
work
| into this settings system. Maybe in the next version.
|
|
| "Steven Cheng[MSFT]" wrote:
|
| > Hi Kimbell,
| >
| > Welcome to ASP.NET newsgroup.
| > Regarding on the configuration issue you mentioned when using
TableAdapter
| > from class library in asp.net 2.0 project, I've also met this problem
| > before. Yes, as you has mentioned, when we has build the
| > DataSet/TableAdapter in class library project, the TableAdapter's
| > Connection /ConnectionString setting is persisted in the classlibrary
| > assembly's content so that when referenced in asp.net 2.0 project, it
won't
| > use the web.config file's info (but still use the one persisted at
| > design-time in classlibrary project). Based on my research, as for the
| > Project Settings, the asp.net 2.0 seems has different support from
winform
| > project. Currently one approach is manually modify the TableAdapter's
| > design-time generated code in the Classlibrary project. for example:
| >
| > the TAbleAdapter's autogenerate code is as below, the "InitConnection"
| > function is just the one which supply connectionstring and constructing
the
| > Connection instance for the TableAdapter
| >
| > =============================
| > private void InitConnection()
| > {
| > this.m_connection = new System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection();
| > this.m_connection.ConnectionString =
| > DSLibrary.Properties.Settings.Default.NorthwindCon nectionString;
| > }
| >
| > which retrieve the connection string through Project's
Properties.Settings
| > collection. We can modify it to the following one:
| >
| > ======================
| >
| > Object obj =
| >
System.Configuration.ConfigurationSettings.GetConf ig("connectionStrings");
| > ConnectionStringsSection css = obj as ConnectionStringsSection;
| > string connstr =
| > css.ConnectionStrings["LocalNorthwindConnStr"].ConnectionString;
| > this.m_connection = new System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection();
| > this.m_connection.ConnectionString = connstr;
| >
| > =====================
| >
| > so that it will retrieve the info from the final hosting application's
| > application config file (appconfig or web.config).
| >
| > Hope helps. Thanks,
| >
| > Steven Cheng
| > Microsoft Online Support
| >
|
|

TableAdapters and web.config

I have a class library that contains a number of TableAdapters and I'm using
this from a web application. Is there a way of getting the TableAdapters to
use the connectionstrings defined in web.config.
From the MSDN documentation it seems like it's possible to override settings
with values in a config file for winform applications. Is the same possible
for web applications.
I have tried to add a connectionstring (under the connectionstring section)
in web.config with the same name as the name in the setting file. The
connectionstring in web.config points to a database that doesn't contain the
required schema. Since I'm not getting any errors and things are still
working, I assume it is still using the default connectionstring supplied at
designtime.Hi Kimbell,
Welcome to ASP.NET newsgroup.
Regarding on the configuration issue you mentioned when using TableAdapter
from class library in asp.net 2.0 project, I've also met this problem
before. Yes, as you has mentioned, when we has build the
DataSet/TableAdapter in class library project, the TableAdapter's
Connection /ConnectionString setting is persisted in the classlibrary
assembly's content so that when referenced in asp.net 2.0 project, it won't
use the web.config file's info (but still use the one persisted at
design-time in classlibrary project). Based on my research, as for the
Project Settings, the asp.net 2.0 seems has different support from winform
project. Currently one approach is manually modify the TableAdapter's
design-time generated code in the Classlibrary project. for example:
the TAbleAdapter's autogenerate code is as below, the "InitConnection"
function is just the one which supply connectionstring and constructing the
Connection instance for the TableAdapter
=============================
private void InitConnection()
{
this.m_connection = new System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection();
this.m_connection.ConnectionString =
DSLibrary.Properties.Settings.Default.NorthwindConnectionString;
}
which retrieve the connection string through Project's Properties.Settings
collection. We can modify it to the following one:
======================
Object obj =
System.Configuration.ConfigurationSettings.GetConfig("connectionStrings");
ConnectionStringsSection css = obj as ConnectionStringsSection;
string connstr =
css.ConnectionStrings["LocalNorthwindConnStr"].ConnectionString;
this.m_connection = new System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection();
this.m_connection.ConnectionString = connstr;
=====================
so that it will retrieve the info from the final hosting application's
application config file (appconfig or web.config).
Hope helps. Thanks,
Steven Cheng
Microsoft Online Support
Get Secure! www.microsoft.com/security
| Thread-Topic: TableAdapters and web.config
| thread-index: AcXNckyfTDC6JTskQe231gX8p+7Y9A==
| X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 195.139.24.170
| From: "examnotes"
<c_kimbell@.newsgroup.nospam>
| Subject: TableAdapters and web.config
| Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 01:12:04 -0700
| Lines: 15
| Message-ID: <69C48290-408C-4942-9F61-3C909A6766E3@.microsoft.com>
| MIME-Version: 1.0
| Content-Type: text/plain;
| charset="Utf-8"
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
| X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
| Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
| Importance: normal
| Priority: normal
| X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
| NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
| Path: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
| Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl
microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet:349611
| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
|
| I have a class library that contains a number of TableAdapters and I'm
using
| this from a web application. Is there a way of getting the TableAdapters
to
| use the connectionstrings defined in web.config.
|
| From the MSDN documentation it seems like it's possible to override
settings
| with values in a config file for winform applications. Is the same
possible
| for web applications.
|
| I have tried to add a connectionstring (under the connectionstring
section)
| in web.config with the same name as the name in the setting file. The
| connectionstring in web.config points to a database that doesn't contain
the
| required schema. Since I'm not getting any errors and things are still
| working, I assume it is still using the default connectionstring supplied
at
| designtime.
|
|
So what you are recommending is to change the autogenerated code?
What about the following warning at the top of the file:
"Changes to this file may cause incorrect behavior and will be lost if the
code is regenerated."
Particularly the statement about lost changes.
I think a better approach is to change the ConnectionModifier to public in
the designer; then set the connectionstring from code.
I was hoping for a more elegant solution since Microsoft has put some work
into this settings system. Maybe in the next version.
"Steven Cheng[MSFT]" wrote:

> Hi Kimbell,
> Welcome to ASP.NET newsgroup.
> Regarding on the configuration issue you mentioned when using TableAdapter
> from class library in asp.net 2.0 project, I've also met this problem
> before. Yes, as you has mentioned, when we has build the
> DataSet/TableAdapter in class library project, the TableAdapter's
> Connection /ConnectionString setting is persisted in the classlibrary
> assembly's content so that when referenced in asp.net 2.0 project, it won'
t
> use the web.config file's info (but still use the one persisted at
> design-time in classlibrary project). Based on my research, as for the
> Project Settings, the asp.net 2.0 seems has different support from winform
> project. Currently one approach is manually modify the TableAdapter's
> design-time generated code in the Classlibrary project. for example:
> the TAbleAdapter's autogenerate code is as below, the "InitConnection"
> function is just the one which supply connectionstring and constructing th
e
> Connection instance for the TableAdapter
> =============================
> private void InitConnection()
> {
> this.m_connection = new System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection();
> this.m_connection.ConnectionString =
> DSLibrary.Properties.Settings.Default.NorthwindConnectionString;
> }
> which retrieve the connection string through Project's Properties.Setting
s
> collection. We can modify it to the following one:
> ======================
> Object obj =
> System.Configuration.ConfigurationSettings.GetConfig("connectionStrings");
> ConnectionStringsSection css = obj as ConnectionStringsSection;
> string connstr =
> css.ConnectionStrings["LocalNorthwindConnStr"].ConnectionString;
> this.m_connection = new System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection();
> this.m_connection.ConnectionString = connstr;
> =====================
> so that it will retrieve the info from the final hosting application's
> application config file (appconfig or web.config).
> Hope helps. Thanks,
> Steven Cheng
> Microsoft Online Support
>
Thanks for your response Kimbell,
Yes, the
========
"Changes to this file may cause incorrect behavior and will be lost if the
code is regenerated."
========
you mentioned is really a potential problem with my workaround. And your
appoarch on changing the ConnectionModifer to public is OK for
programmatical accessing. However, in most cases of ASP.NET 2.0 web
application, we will use design-time ObjectDataSource control to reference
the TableAdpater, and this is done through IDE interactively no code is
involved. So in such scenario, we may need to predefined the connection's
initilization in TableAdapter's code.
Anyway, I really appreciate your advice on the configuration setttings ,
and since this is a new feature involved in 2.0, I think it'll be improved
in the sequential versions so as to ease the component, class library
developing and seamless integrated into
front end applications.
Thanks,
Steven Cheng
Microsoft Online Support
Get Secure! www.microsoft.com/security
--
| Thread-Topic: TableAdapters and web.config
| thread-index: AcXOO+CVs5sRlZYtRh+M2u+nQzNUBg==
| X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 195.139.24.170
| From: "examnotes"
<c_kimbell@.newsgroup.nospam>
| References: <69C48290-408C-4942-9F61-3C909A6766E3@.microsoft.com>
<o4v8pDhzFHA.3712@.TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl>
| Subject: RE: TableAdapters and web.config
| Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:15:01 -0700
| Lines: 68
| Message-ID: <EAC2EB76-0E98-4837-AD33-55A57F82A6EA@.microsoft.com>
| MIME-Version: 1.0
| Content-Type: text/plain;
| charset="Utf-8"
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
| X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
| Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
| Importance: normal
| Priority: normal
| X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
| NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
| Path: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
| Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl
microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet:349877
| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
|
| So what you are recommending is to change the autogenerated code?
| What about the following warning at the top of the file:
|
| "Changes to this file may cause incorrect behavior and will be lost if
the
| code is regenerated."
|
| Particularly the statement about lost changes.
|
| I think a better approach is to change the ConnectionModifier to public
in
| the designer; then set the connectionstring from code.
|
| I was hoping for a more elegant solution since Microsoft has put some
work
| into this settings system. Maybe in the next version.
|
|
| "Steven Cheng[MSFT]" wrote:
|
| > Hi Kimbell,
| >
| > Welcome to ASP.NET newsgroup.
| > Regarding on the configuration issue you mentioned when using
TableAdapter
| > from class library in asp.net 2.0 project, I've also met this problem
| > before. Yes, as you has mentioned, when we has build the
| > DataSet/TableAdapter in class library project, the TableAdapter's
| > Connection /ConnectionString setting is persisted in the classlibrary
| > assembly's content so that when referenced in asp.net 2.0 project, it
won't
| > use the web.config file's info (but still use the one persisted at
| > design-time in classlibrary project). Based on my research, as for the
| > Project Settings, the asp.net 2.0 seems has different support from
winform
| > project. Currently one approach is manually modify the TableAdapter's
| > design-time generated code in the Classlibrary project. for example:
| >
| > the TAbleAdapter's autogenerate code is as below, the "InitConnection"
| > function is just the one which supply connectionstring and constructing
the
| > Connection instance for the TableAdapter
| >
| > =============================
| > private void InitConnection()
| > {
| > this.m_connection = new System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection();
| > this.m_connection.ConnectionString =
| > DSLibrary.Properties.Settings.Default.NorthwindConnectionString;
| > }
| >
| > which retrieve the connection string through Project's
Properties.Settings
| > collection. We can modify it to the following one:
| >
| > ======================
| >
| > Object obj =
| >
System.Configuration.ConfigurationSettings.GetConfig("connectionStrings");
| > ConnectionStringsSection css = obj as ConnectionStringsSection;
| > string connstr =
| > css.ConnectionStrings["LocalNorthwindConnStr"].ConnectionString;
| > this.m_connection = new System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection();
| > this.m_connection.ConnectionString = connstr;
| >
| > =====================
| >
| > so that it will retrieve the info from the final hosting application's
| > application config file (appconfig or web.config).
| >
| > Hope helps. Thanks,
| >
| > Steven Cheng
| > Microsoft Online Support
| >
|
|

Tables Login

Hello,
I've developed an application in VB .NET 2005. To login I've used the login
view control of ASP .NET 2005. But now I've to install it, and I don't know
how could I create the tables to login?.
My apologize for my english.
Thanks for all,
SilviaLl.Which database are you using? I believe that there is an Access membership
provider somewhere, if so it's probably on the www.asp.net website.
You can install the membership to a web server using a utility found in the
Windows\Microsoft.Net\Framework\v2.0.50727 directory. The utility is called
aspnet_regsql.exe. It should launch a wizard that will walk you through
creating all the necessary items for using membership as well as role
management and personalization.
Hope this helps,
Mark Fitzpatrick
Former Microsoft FrontPage MVP 199...2006
"Silviall" <slladoARROBAgmailPUNTOcoEME> wrote in message
news:O$S9PWq$GHA.3836@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Hello,
> I've developed an application in VB .NET 2005. To login I've used the
> login view control of ASP .NET 2005. But now I've to install it, and I
> don't know how could I create the tables to login?.
> My apologize for my english.
> Thanks for all,
> SilviaLl.
>
Hello Mark,
I'm using SQL Server.
Thanks for all,
SilviaLl.
"Mark Fitzpatrick" <markfitz@.fitzme.com> escribi en el mensaje
news:uH7aGvq$GHA.4024@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Which database are you using? I believe that there is an Access membership
> provider somewhere, if so it's probably on the www.asp.net website.
> You can install the membership to a web server using a utility found in
> the Windows\Microsoft.Net\Framework\v2.0.50727 directory. The utility is
> called aspnet_regsql.exe. It should launch a wizard that will walk you
> through creating all the necessary items for using membership as well as
> role management and personalization.
>
> --
> Hope this helps,
> Mark Fitzpatrick
> Former Microsoft FrontPage MVP 199...2006
> "Silviall" <slladoARROBAgmailPUNTOcoEME> wrote in message
> news:O$S9PWq$GHA.3836@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>

Tables Login

Hello,

I've developed an application in VB .NET 2005. To login I've used the login
view control of ASP .NET 2005. But now I've to install it, and I don't know
how could I create the tables to login?.

My apologize for my english.

Thanks for all,

SilviaLl.Which database are you using? I believe that there is an Access membership
provider somewhere, if so it's probably on the www.asp.net website.

You can install the membership to a web server using a utility found in the
Windows\Microsoft.Net\Framework\v2.0.50727 directory. The utility is called
aspnet_regsql.exe. It should launch a wizard that will walk you through
creating all the necessary items for using membership as well as role
management and personalization.

--
Hope this helps,
Mark Fitzpatrick
Former Microsoft FrontPage MVP 199?-2006

"Silviall" <slladoARROBAgmailPUNTOcoEMEwrote in message
news:O$S9PWq$GHA.3836@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

Quote:

Originally Posted by

Hello,
>
I've developed an application in VB .NET 2005. To login I've used the
login view control of ASP .NET 2005. But now I've to install it, and I
don't know how could I create the tables to login?.
>
My apologize for my english.
>
Thanks for all,
>
SilviaLl.
>

Hello Mark,

I'm using SQL Server.

Thanks for all,

SilviaLl.
"Mark Fitzpatrick" <markfitz@.fitzme.comescribi en el mensaje
news:uH7aGvq$GHA.4024@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

Quote:

Originally Posted by

Which database are you using? I believe that there is an Access membership
provider somewhere, if so it's probably on the www.asp.net website.
>
You can install the membership to a web server using a utility found in
the Windows\Microsoft.Net\Framework\v2.0.50727 directory. The utility is
called aspnet_regsql.exe. It should launch a wizard that will walk you
through creating all the necessary items for using membership as well as
role management and personalization.
>
>
--
Hope this helps,
Mark Fitzpatrick
Former Microsoft FrontPage MVP 199?-2006
>
"Silviall" <slladoARROBAgmailPUNTOcoEMEwrote in message
news:O$S9PWq$GHA.3836@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

Quote:

Originally Posted by

>Hello,
>>
>I've developed an application in VB .NET 2005. To login I've used the
>login view control of ASP .NET 2005. But now I've to install it, and I
>don't know how could I create the tables to login?.
>>
>My apologize for my english.
>>
>Thanks for all,
>>
>SilviaLl.
>>

>
>

TabPage Control ?

Hello,

I want to create a TabPage control for my web application like one page layout with 2 different pages, but in the toolbox VS2005 doesn't have that option, So instead of creating 2 different pages and directing from one to the another, I'm wondering if I could use the TabPage control to keep one page layout and have the ability to flip back and fourth from one page to another, Does anyone knows how to do it and really appreciated if have any tips or suggestions on how to accomplish this, thanks

Have you considered using the ASP.NET AJAX TabControl or using a MultiView control to simulates Tabs?

I would consider to try both if it works, How do you setup the ASP.NET AJAX TabControl in Visual Studio 2005 ? In the toolbox control it doesn't have any TabControl option, all I have is the MultiView in the toolbox but I'm not sure how to setup the multi page inside the MultiView control, Can you guide me through this? thanks

Refer the the link below for an example on using the ASP.NET AJAX TabControl.

http://www.asp.net/learn/ajax-videos/video-156.aspx

Here are a few links for the MultiView Control.

http://www.codeproject.com/aspnet/TabControl.asp

http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/UploadFile/mahesh/Multiview10092005215233PM/Multiview.aspx?ArticleID=ad731f33-820e-4968-89fa-393c43872384

http://www.internet.com/video/ Scroll down the leftside under Developer Videos the Using ASP.NET 2.0 MultiView Control is the last one.

Hope these help.

Tabs in an ASP.NET Application

Does anyone havea good article on how to setup Tabs in an ASP.NET
application? (VB.NET)

I am having a hard time understanding how it works and where to begin. Any
insight would be greatly appreciated.DOTNETGUY wrote:
> Does anyone havea good article on how to setup Tabs in an ASP.NET
> application? (VB.NET)
> I am having a hard time understanding how it works and where to begin. Any
> insight would be greatly appreciated.

Tabs as in hitting the TAB key, or tabs as in a tabbed form?

--
Curt Christianson
site: http://www.darkfalz.com
blog: http://blog.darkfalz.com
Tabbed forms...sorry.

"Curt_C [MVP]" wrote:

> DOTNETGUY wrote:
> > Does anyone havea good article on how to setup Tabs in an ASP.NET
> > application? (VB.NET)
> > I am having a hard time understanding how it works and where to begin. Any
> > insight would be greatly appreciated.
> Tabs as in hitting the TAB key, or tabs as in a tabbed form?
> --
> Curt Christianson
> site: http://www.darkfalz.com
> blog: http://blog.darkfalz.com
DOTNETGUY wrote:
> Tabbed forms...sorry.

We built our own tabbed form. Basically it was single row of table cells
where the click posted back and determined what to show in the bottom
half. We also did a version with no postback that used div's with
hide/show specified with the onclick() events of the hrefs used in the
"tab" cells.

--
Curt Christianson
site: http://www.darkfalz.com
blog: http://blog.darkfalz.com
Has anyone created something like this Tab / Multi-page control form that
uses generic object such that it can be used in Netscape, Opera, Mozilla,
etc? The IE Webcontrols only work with, of course, IE.

"Curt_C [MVP]" <software_at_darkfalz.com> wrote in message
news:OefC%23gjgFHA.3692@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> DOTNETGUY wrote:
> > Tabbed forms...sorry.
> We built our own tabbed form. Basically it was single row of table cells
> where the click posted back and determined what to show in the bottom
> half. We also did a version with no postback that used div's with
> hide/show specified with the onclick() events of the hrefs used in the
> "tab" cells.
>
> --
> Curt Christianson
> site: http://www.darkfalz.com
> blog: http://blog.darkfalz.com

Tabs in ASP.NET 2.0

Hello,

Question for all the .NET gurus. I would like to implement tabs in the web application I'm developing. Many that I've talked to and read are pointing me in the direction of AJAX. I would rather wait for another release of AJAX before I start using it, but my question is: Isn't tabs available in ASP.NET 2.0without getting AJAX? For example, when I go to the built in ASP.NET Web Administration Tool it obviously uses tabs and looks like it is built using ASP.NET 2.0 only. I like the look, feel and functionality of the Web Administration tool and want to implement something similiar in my Web Apps. So if this is using it, why can't I without having to get AJAX?

Thanks,

StrickHave a look at the MultiView control.
It kind of depends on what your goal is with the using the tabs.

If it's simply a style of site navigation, it's quite easy to create images and text that duplicate a simple tab look and feel inside a web control. I haven't looked at it closely but I think that's what the ASP.NET configuration web site does in most places. You could then place the control at the top of all of your pages and have it show the right tab for the loaded page. There are plenty of examples around if you Google for them. You can also buy more complex controls that give you more style, functionality, and ease of use options. It really depends on how much you want to code and draw yourself.

If you're wanting a more interactive solution on a single page, you can use the MultiView control to do that. However, you'll still need to code/draw the simulated tabs yourself in much the same way as mentioned above.

AJAX comes into play when you need to have a tabbed display where you want to submit or update parts of a page separate from the rest. For example, you might have an order form where you want to check current inventory levels and warehouse/store locations when a line item is added but you don't want to submit and refresh the whole page to do it.
Thanks guys. I'm going to look into the multiview. Really, I just want it to do the exact same thing that the windows tab control does. Hopefully I won't have to simulate a tab control. If that's the case, I might as well just have separate pages for each hyperlink. I want the multiview to save me the time of having to have separate pages.

Thanks,

Strick
I like the look, feel and functionality of the Web Administration tool and want to implement something similiar in my Web Apps.

The complete source code for the admin tool is in the following folder

C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\ASP.NETWebAdminFiles
Nice, I'll take a look at that. Thanks!
this seems pretty cool:

http://ajax.asp.net/ajaxtoolkit/Tabs/Tabs.aspx
Yeah, I actually downloaded and played with AJAX a little bit last week. It seems really cool. It just seems like it's not integrated into VS 2005 like it should be. I was gonna wait for another version before I start really using it (which is usually my rule of thumb with brand new microsoft products, lol!), but maybe I'll break my rule for AJAX. Maybe I should go get an AJAX book and read it cover to cover...lol. Any recommendations on books?
Yeah, I actually downloaded and played with AJAX a little bit last week. It seems really cool. It just seems like it's not integrated into VS 2005 like it should be. I was gonna wait for another version before I start really using it (which is usually my rule of thumb with brand new microsoft products, lol!), but maybe I'll break my rule for AJAX. Maybe I should go get an AJAX book and read it cover to cover...lol. Any recommendations on books?
if you go to this link:
http://asp.net/learn/videos/default.aspx?tabid=63

and watch the first 2 vids, they will show you how to put the ajax resources and the AjaxConrolToolkit right inside of your toolbox. That makes them pretty much drag n' drop. I couldn't ask for much more integrated. ;)
U know what sucks now? I'm all ready to learn AJAX and the web host I'm with doesn't even support it yet
Well I think in this situation, u better to use MultiView or LoadControl Method either.

TagPrefix and Assemblies

I'm trying to get something to work based on an existing application. In the existing web.config, there's are assemblies like this one:

<addassembly="Microsoft.SharePoint, Version=11.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429c"/>

Can I copy and paste these assemblies into my web.config or were these generated some way that I need to generate them.

Also, in the master page, there's this tag prefix:

<%@dotnet.itags.org.RegisterTagprefix="SharePoint"Namespace="Microsoft.SharePoint.WebControls"Assembly="Microsoft.SharePoint, Version=11.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429c" %>

Can I just copy and paste this into mine, or do I have to create a unique one...and how would I do that?

Thanks!

Yupp! Go ahead use them. They'll work.

Unless an assembly is of different build/version, you can simply copy && paste.

Take Application off line quickly

Suppose I need to make an ASP.NET Web application inaccessible to anyone
trying to open any of its pages. How can this be done quickly - and in a way
that allows me to bring the whole thing back online quickly?1) Shut down IIS - of course this will give them a page not found type of
error
2) You can configure a virtual directory in IIS to redirect to a given URL.
This URL can then inform the user that the site is down and to try again
later. This would probably be more user friendly.
"Guadala Harry" <GMan@.NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:uLeqQ17rEHA.1816@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Suppose I need to make an ASP.NET Web application inaccessible to anyone
> trying to open any of its pages. How can this be done quickly - and in a
way
> that allows me to bring the whole thing back online quickly?
>
You could just stop the IIS site. You could also hanlde this in the app
itself if needed (especially if it could be interesting to "filter" those
who are allowed to log on when the app is in this particular state).
The overall goal may yield a better suggestion.
Patrice
"Guadala Harry" <GMan@.NoSpam.com> a crit dans le message de
news:uLeqQ17rEHA.1816@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Suppose I need to make an ASP.NET Web application inaccessible to anyone
> trying to open any of its pages. How can this be done quickly - and in a
way
> that allows me to bring the whole thing back online quickly?
>
Yes - the overall goal (small detail!): Here it is: I have to periodically
bring a site down for maintenance (anywhere from 2 minutes to 2 hours;
install upgaded assemblies, updated aspx files, modify database etc); during
which period I don't want anyone to come in - and after which I want to
allow everyone back in of course. I don't mind killing existing sessions
(could easily pick a time of day to minimize such occurances in this
low-volume application). It would be great if the user could see some
informative message when they attempt to open any page in the site - rather
than some error that drives them to call tech support.
Thanks!
-GH
"Patrice" <nobody@.nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:uAZQII8rEHA.4008@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> You could just stop the IIS site. You could also hanlde this in the app
> itself if needed (especially if it could be interesting to "filter" those
> who are allowed to log on when the app is in this particular state).
> The overall goal may yield a better suggestion.
> Patrice
> --
> "Guadala Harry" <GMan@.NoSpam.com> a crit dans le message de
> news:uLeqQ17rEHA.1816@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> way
>
Ok so you have the options :
- virtual dir as suggested by Marina
- adding this into the app will allow some accounts to connect so that you
can check that it works before bringing things online again.
As a side note, I believe to have read that ASP.NET actually caches the DLLs
(including ASPX code behind) so that you can update DLLs and pages "on the
fly". You could ask this in a separate thread. For the database, you could
prepare a script.
Though I admit we have no high volume (vertical applications) and that users
are generally located in the same country (allowing to update during lunch
or after the day work), IMO you could look also if you can shorten the time
it takes to perform this update and in some cases it could be even almost
useless to "close" the site.
As an additonal note, you may want also to display a "message of the day"
*before* the update so that they know the site *will* be updated while they
work. Bascially I would see :
- Schelded date for the next update and expected duratino (few days before)
- a warning message or blocking the site during the update (tyhat should be
IMO almost "automated" ie blocking or anbeling the warning, copying prepared
files to update DLLs and pages, running a script)
- you do the final check by hand and can correct what unexpectedly goes
wrong
- when all is ok, you manually enable the site again
Patrice
"Guadala Harry" <GMan@.NoSpam.com> a crit dans le message de
news:ObCupT8rEHA.736@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Yes - the overall goal (small detail!): Here it is: I have to
periodically
> bring a site down for maintenance (anywhere from 2 minutes to 2 hours;
> install upgaded assemblies, updated aspx files, modify database etc);
during
> which period I don't want anyone to come in - and after which I want to
> allow everyone back in of course. I don't mind killing existing sessions
> (could easily pick a time of day to minimize such occurances in this
> low-volume application). It would be great if the user could see some
> informative message when they attempt to open any page in the site -
rather
> than some error that drives them to call tech support.
> Thanks!
> -GH
>
> "Patrice" <nobody@.nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:uAZQII8rEHA.4008@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
those
anyone
a
>
Thanks!
"Patrice" <nobody@.nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:eLAomg8rEHA.3428@.TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Ok so you have the options :
> - virtual dir as suggested by Marina
> - adding this into the app will allow some accounts to connect so that you
> can check that it works before bringing things online again.
> As a side note, I believe to have read that ASP.NET actually caches the
DLLs
> (including ASPX code behind) so that you can update DLLs and pages "on the
> fly". You could ask this in a separate thread. For the database, you could
> prepare a script.
> Though I admit we have no high volume (vertical applications) and that
users
> are generally located in the same country (allowing to update during lunch
> or after the day work), IMO you could look also if you can shorten the
time
> it takes to perform this update and in some cases it could be even almost
> useless to "close" the site.
> As an additonal note, you may want also to display a "message of the day"
> *before* the update so that they know the site *will* be updated while
they
> work. Bascially I would see :
> - Schelded date for the next update and expected duratino (few days
before)
> - a warning message or blocking the site during the update (tyhat should
be
> IMO almost "automated" ie blocking or anbeling the warning, copying
prepared
> files to update DLLs and pages, running a script)
> - you do the final check by hand and can correct what unexpectedly goes
> wrong
> - when all is ok, you manually enable the site again
> Patrice
> --
> "Guadala Harry" <GMan@.NoSpam.com> a crit dans le message de
> news:ObCupT8rEHA.736@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> periodically
> during
> rather
app
> those
> anyone
in
> a
>

Take Application off line quickly

Suppose I need to make an ASP.NET Web application inaccessible to anyone
trying to open any of its pages. How can this be done quickly - and in a way
that allows me to bring the whole thing back online quickly?1) Shut down IIS - of course this will give them a page not found type of
error
2) You can configure a virtual directory in IIS to redirect to a given URL.
This URL can then inform the user that the site is down and to try again
later. This would probably be more user friendly.

"Guadala Harry" <GMan@.NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:uLeqQ17rEHA.1816@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Suppose I need to make an ASP.NET Web application inaccessible to anyone
> trying to open any of its pages. How can this be done quickly - and in a
way
> that allows me to bring the whole thing back online quickly?
You could just stop the IIS site. You could also hanlde this in the app
itself if needed (especially if it could be interesting to "filter" those
who are allowed to log on when the app is in this particular state).

The overall goal may yield a better suggestion.

Patrice

--

"Guadala Harry" <GMan@.NoSpam.com> a crit dans le message de
news:uLeqQ17rEHA.1816@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Suppose I need to make an ASP.NET Web application inaccessible to anyone
> trying to open any of its pages. How can this be done quickly - and in a
way
> that allows me to bring the whole thing back online quickly?
Yes - the overall goal (small detail!): Here it is: I have to periodically
bring a site down for maintenance (anywhere from 2 minutes to 2 hours;
install upgaded assemblies, updated aspx files, modify database etc); during
which period I don't want anyone to come in - and after which I want to
allow everyone back in of course. I don't mind killing existing sessions
(could easily pick a time of day to minimize such occurances in this
low-volume application). It would be great if the user could see some
informative message when they attempt to open any page in the site - rather
than some error that drives them to call tech support.

Thanks!

-GH

"Patrice" <nobody@.nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:uAZQII8rEHA.4008@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> You could just stop the IIS site. You could also hanlde this in the app
> itself if needed (especially if it could be interesting to "filter" those
> who are allowed to log on when the app is in this particular state).
> The overall goal may yield a better suggestion.
> Patrice
> --
> "Guadala Harry" <GMan@.NoSpam.com> a crit dans le message de
> news:uLeqQ17rEHA.1816@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > Suppose I need to make an ASP.NET Web application inaccessible to anyone
> > trying to open any of its pages. How can this be done quickly - and in a
> way
> > that allows me to bring the whole thing back online quickly?
Ok so you have the options :
- virtual dir as suggested by Marina
- adding this into the app will allow some accounts to connect so that you
can check that it works before bringing things online again.

As a side note, I believe to have read that ASP.NET actually caches the DLLs
(including ASPX code behind) so that you can update DLLs and pages "on the
fly". You could ask this in a separate thread. For the database, you could
prepare a script.

Though I admit we have no high volume (vertical applications) and that users
are generally located in the same country (allowing to update during lunch
or after the day work), IMO you could look also if you can shorten the time
it takes to perform this update and in some cases it could be even almost
useless to "close" the site.

As an additonal note, you may want also to display a "message of the day"
*before* the update so that they know the site *will* be updated while they
work. Bascially I would see :
- Schelded date for the next update and expected duratino (few days before)
- a warning message or blocking the site during the update (tyhat should be
IMO almost "automated" ie blocking or anbeling the warning, copying prepared
files to update DLLs and pages, running a script)
- you do the final check by hand and can correct what unexpectedly goes
wrong
- when all is ok, you manually enable the site again

Patrice

--

"Guadala Harry" <GMan@.NoSpam.com> a crit dans le message de
news:ObCupT8rEHA.736@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Yes - the overall goal (small detail!): Here it is: I have to
periodically
> bring a site down for maintenance (anywhere from 2 minutes to 2 hours;
> install upgaded assemblies, updated aspx files, modify database etc);
during
> which period I don't want anyone to come in - and after which I want to
> allow everyone back in of course. I don't mind killing existing sessions
> (could easily pick a time of day to minimize such occurances in this
> low-volume application). It would be great if the user could see some
> informative message when they attempt to open any page in the site -
rather
> than some error that drives them to call tech support.
> Thanks!
> -GH
>
> "Patrice" <nobody@.nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:uAZQII8rEHA.4008@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> > You could just stop the IIS site. You could also hanlde this in the app
> > itself if needed (especially if it could be interesting to "filter"
those
> > who are allowed to log on when the app is in this particular state).
> > The overall goal may yield a better suggestion.
> > Patrice
> > --
> > "Guadala Harry" <GMan@.NoSpam.com> a crit dans le message de
> > news:uLeqQ17rEHA.1816@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > > Suppose I need to make an ASP.NET Web application inaccessible to
anyone
> > > trying to open any of its pages. How can this be done quickly - and in
a
> > way
> > > that allows me to bring the whole thing back online quickly?
> >
Thanks!

"Patrice" <nobody@.nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:eLAomg8rEHA.3428@.TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Ok so you have the options :
> - virtual dir as suggested by Marina
> - adding this into the app will allow some accounts to connect so that you
> can check that it works before bringing things online again.
> As a side note, I believe to have read that ASP.NET actually caches the
DLLs
> (including ASPX code behind) so that you can update DLLs and pages "on the
> fly". You could ask this in a separate thread. For the database, you could
> prepare a script.
> Though I admit we have no high volume (vertical applications) and that
users
> are generally located in the same country (allowing to update during lunch
> or after the day work), IMO you could look also if you can shorten the
time
> it takes to perform this update and in some cases it could be even almost
> useless to "close" the site.
> As an additonal note, you may want also to display a "message of the day"
> *before* the update so that they know the site *will* be updated while
they
> work. Bascially I would see :
> - Schelded date for the next update and expected duratino (few days
before)
> - a warning message or blocking the site during the update (tyhat should
be
> IMO almost "automated" ie blocking or anbeling the warning, copying
prepared
> files to update DLLs and pages, running a script)
> - you do the final check by hand and can correct what unexpectedly goes
> wrong
> - when all is ok, you manually enable the site again
> Patrice
> --
> "Guadala Harry" <GMan@.NoSpam.com> a crit dans le message de
> news:ObCupT8rEHA.736@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > Yes - the overall goal (small detail!): Here it is: I have to
> periodically
> > bring a site down for maintenance (anywhere from 2 minutes to 2 hours;
> > install upgaded assemblies, updated aspx files, modify database etc);
> during
> > which period I don't want anyone to come in - and after which I want to
> > allow everyone back in of course. I don't mind killing existing sessions
> > (could easily pick a time of day to minimize such occurances in this
> > low-volume application). It would be great if the user could see some
> > informative message when they attempt to open any page in the site -
> rather
> > than some error that drives them to call tech support.
> > Thanks!
> > -GH
> > "Patrice" <nobody@.nowhere.com> wrote in message
> > news:uAZQII8rEHA.4008@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> > > You could just stop the IIS site. You could also hanlde this in the
app
> > > itself if needed (especially if it could be interesting to "filter"
> those
> > > who are allowed to log on when the app is in this particular state).
> > > > The overall goal may yield a better suggestion.
> > > > Patrice
> > > > --
> > > > "Guadala Harry" <GMan@.NoSpam.com> a crit dans le message de
> > > news:uLeqQ17rEHA.1816@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > > > Suppose I need to make an ASP.NET Web application inaccessible to
> anyone
> > > > trying to open any of its pages. How can this be done quickly - and
in
> a
> > > way
> > > > that allows me to bring the whole thing back online quickly?
> > > > > >

taking a build of asp.net 2005 application.

hai

please help me. when i am trying to get a build i got this problem. here i am giving that error. please if any one can resolve it respond to this.

Compilation Error

Description:An error occurred during the compilation of a resource required to service this request. Please review the following specific error details and modify your source code appropriately.

Compiler Error Message:CS0030: Cannot convert type 'ASP.login_aspx' to 'System.Web.UI.WebControls.Login'

Source Error:

Line 120: public login_aspx() {Line 121: string[] dependencies;Line 122: ((Login)(this)).AppRelativeVirtualPath = "~/Login.aspx";Line 123: if ((global::ASP.login_aspx.@dotnet.itags.org.__initialized == false)) {Line 124: global::ASP.login_aspx.@dotnet.itags.org.__stringResource = this.ReadStringResource();

Source File: c:\WINNT\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\Temporary ASP.NET Files\its\6b99b5ef\95ca6e32\App_Web_login.aspx.cdcab7d2.b6tyqpzy.0.cs Line: 122

Hi and Welcome to ASP.NET Forum!

this in your context refers to System.Web.UI.Page and you are trying to cast it to Login (which of type System.Web.UI.WebControls.Login) which cannot be done. What you are trying to do? Are you trying to get a reference to the page?

Thanks

Target schema for validation?

Hello everyone,

Can someone tell me which "Target schema for validation" is suitable for VS 05 web application or ASP.NET version2 application? I have set "Internet Explorer 6.0" for Target schema for validation but always get tag errors like:

Validation (Internet Explorer 6): The values permitted for this attribute do not include 'middle'.

Validation (Internet Explorer 6): Element 'table' cannot be nested within element 'span'.

Validation (Internet Explorer 6): Attribute 'size' is not a valid attribute of element 'input'.

How do I avoid these validation errors and which one is the right "Target schema for validation"? Thanks in advance.

The target schema will depend on the DOCTYPE you've chosen but ideally, you should target the latest versions so an XHTML 1.1 DOCTYPE will target the latest version of CSS (in my case the latest version in the dropdownlist was CSS2.1). However, this doesn't really have any relevance as the best method you can use is to use anon line validator and validate the final HTML that is sent to the browser.

Targetting the frameset from the address bar

Hello fellows,
I have a Web application using frameset and frames. When I click in a
hyperlink button I can send the selected aspx page using the "target"
attribute into the selected frame. However when the aspx page is called from
IE address bar the page is loaded into the entire browser and not into the
frame I would like to. I tried to use the target attribute of the attribute
form but it does not work.
I noticed that when the page is called from the address bar the content of
"Request.UrlReferrer" is null but I do not find how to send this page into
the desired frame programmatically.
It would be appreciated if anybody knows how to redirect the page into the
frame.
Thanks in advance
PetePut this in the HEAD section of the subframe pages that people could try to
load without the main frameset page:

<SCRIPT LANGUAGE="JavaScript">
<!--

if (top.location.href.indexOf("frameset.aspx") == -1)
top.location.href = "frameset.aspx";

// -->
</SCRIPT>

Peter
--
Co-founder, Eggheadcafe.com developer portal:
http://www.eggheadcafe.com
UnBlog:
http://petesbloggerama.blogspot.com
"Pierre" wrote:

Quote:

Originally Posted by

Hello fellows,
I have a Web application using frameset and frames. When I click in a
hyperlink button I can send the selected aspx page using the "target"
attribute into the selected frame. However when the aspx page is called from
IE address bar the page is loaded into the entire browser and not into the
frame I would like to. I tried to use the target attribute of the attribute
form but it does not work.
I noticed that when the page is called from the address bar the content of
"Request.UrlReferrer" is null but I do not find how to send this page into
the desired frame programmatically.
It would be appreciated if anybody knows how to redirect the page into the
frame.
Thanks in advance
Pete

Thanks a lot Peter

After a dummy test with frameset I finally got what I need with your answer.

Regards,

Pete

"Peter Bromberg [C# MVP]" wrote:

Quote:

Originally Posted by

Put this in the HEAD section of the subframe pages that people could try to
load without the main frameset page:
>
<SCRIPT LANGUAGE="JavaScript">
<!--
>
if (top.location.href.indexOf("frameset.aspx") == -1)
top.location.href = "frameset.aspx";
>
// -->
</SCRIPT>
>
Peter
--
Co-founder, Eggheadcafe.com developer portal:
http://www.eggheadcafe.com
UnBlog:
http://petesbloggerama.blogspot.com
>
>
>
>
"Pierre" wrote:
>

Quote:

Originally Posted by

Hello fellows,
I have a Web application using frameset and frames. When I click in a
hyperlink button I can send the selected aspx page using the "target"
attribute into the selected frame. However when the aspx page is called from
IE address bar the page is loaded into the entire browser and not into the
frame I would like to. I tried to use the target attribute of the attribute
form but it does not work.
I noticed that when the page is called from the address bar the content of
"Request.UrlReferrer" is null but I do not find how to send this page into
the desired frame programmatically.
It would be appreciated if anybody knows how to redirect the page into the
frame.
Thanks in advance
Pete